Your analysts should be running simulations. Not answering emails about them.
MXTechies builds request intake, result dashboards and compliance reporting around Simcenter, so the analysis team spends its time on analysis.
Certified Mendix partner 250+ AI certified developers US, India and UAE
Never modified — apps run outside it
A diagram: a Mendix application layer containing request intake, result dashboards, test comparison, compliance reports and batch submission, reading through the Teamcenter Connector, where simulation results are managed. Simcenter itself — solvers, meshes, load cases, models and licensing — is never modified.
Simcenter is the Siemens simulation and test portfolio, covering structural, thermal, fluid, motion and multi-physics analysis alongside physical testing. Mendix applications do not run simulations. They handle everything around them — intake, status, result dashboards, test comparison and compliance reporting — reading simulation data through Teamcenter rather than from Simcenter directly.
Simulation is the one Siemens discipline where the scarce resource is people, not software. A US engineering team has a handful of CAE analysts serving many design engineers, and every question queues behind them. What fills an analyst week is rarely the analysis.
| Where the time goes | Today | What an app removes |
|---|---|---|
| Request intake | Email, missing the load case | A form that will not submit without it |
| Status chasing | Three people ask where their run is | A status view anyone can check |
| Distributing results | Export plots, email a PDF | A view the requester opens |
| Repeating standard cases | The same study, new inputs | Batch submission |
| Compliance reporting | Evidence assembled by hand | Generated from captured data |
| Finding old results | Has anyone run this before? | A searchable record of runs |
None of that is analysis. All of it is application work — a stronger case than any speed claim about the platform.
Implying a Mendix app talks to a CFD solver would be spotted by the person evaluating this page.
And there does not need to be. Results, models and their associations are managed in Teamcenter, and that is where an application reads from.
Where a Simcenter product exposes an API worth calling, that is a custom integration.
Solvers, meshes and load cases stay with the analyst. The application handles what happens before and after the run.
Simcenter is a portfolio, and the answer changes the integration. Simcenter 3D flows through Teamcenter and is the usual starting point. STAR-CCM+ produces large files, so the app handles summaries rather than raw field data. Amesim parameter studies suit dashboards. Testlab is the test side of a comparison. HEEDS runs in the thousands, which is where a dashboard earns its place.
Four prebuilt modules do the work: Product View 360, Teamcenter Connector, Data Widgets and Connector Toolbox. Three of four are Teamcenter modules — the architecture, not a gap.
See automotive and electronics, or the wider analytics practice.
| Stage | What happens | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Shadow the analyst | A day watching where the hours actually go, which is almost never where the org chart says | Week 1 |
| Prototype | On your real data | Weeks 1–3 |
| Build | Roles, permissions, exceptions | Weeks 3–8 |
| Rollout | Analysis team first | After build |
On a topic where the bottleneck is a handful of specialists, an assessment that does not sit with those specialists scopes the wrong thing.
Certified Mendix partner in the Siemens Xcelerator ecosystem.
Six Siemens systems in delivery.
We read simulation data the way it is actually managed, rather than promising a direct solver integration.
US, India and UAE teams.
Through Teamcenter, using the Teamcenter Connector, because that is where results and models are managed. A Mendix application does not talk to a solver.
Yes, and it is the most common reason these get built. A design engineer sees the conclusion without opening a CAE tool.
No. Applications run outside Simcenter, so solvers, models and licensing are untouched.
Yes. Test data, including from Simcenter Testlab, sits alongside simulation results so correlation is visible.
Standard studies can be batch-submitted with reports generated automatically, so only unusual cases need an analyst.
Yes, from data already captured. The application produces the evidence; your quality team owns the submission.
Two to six weeks using prebuilt components. Timeline follows data and roles, not the physics.
Role-based access and single sign-on, mapped to what each user can already see in Teamcenter. Cloud, hybrid or on-premises.
Not the solve time. The whole thing, from the day someone asked to the day they had an answer. If those two numbers are far apart, the gap is not analysis. Tell us what your gap looks like.
Forty-five minutes · no prep
